Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I guess I need to point out that those ereport calls already pose a far
> >> more substantial risk of palloc failure than the DLNewElem represents.
>
> > Hmm, do they? I mean, don't they use ErrorContext, which is supposed to
> > be preallocated?
>
> Well, we'd like to think that they pose an insignificant risk, but it's
> hard to credit that DLNewElem isn't insignificant as well.
Yeah, actually as I said earlier, I haven't ever seen this.
> If you're really intent on doing something about this, my inclination
> would be to get rid of the dependence on DLNewElem altogether. Add
> a Dlelem field to the Backend struct and use DLInitElem (compare
> the way catcache uses that module).
Hmm, yeah, I had seen that code. So it looks like this instead.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.