Re: TCP network cost

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Ross J. Reedstrom
Тема
Re: TCP network cost
Дата
Msg-id
20090224170201.GA25420@cooker
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
TCP network cost "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Re: TCP network cost Aaron Turner <synfinatic@gmail.com>
Re: TCP network cost "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Re: TCP network cost Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: TCP network cost "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Re: TCP network cost Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: TCP network cost "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Re: TCP network cost Linos <info@linos.es>
Re: TCP network cost Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: TCP network cost Linos <info@linos.es>
Re: TCP network cost Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: TCP network cost Linos <info@linos.es>
Re: TCP network cost Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: TCP network cost Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: TCP network cost Linos <info@linos.es>
Re: TCP network cost Rusty Conover <rconover@infogears.com>
Re: TCP network cost "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Re: TCP network cost "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Re: TCP network cost Aaron Turner <synfinatic@gmail.com>
Re: TCP network cost PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Re: TCP network cost "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Re: TCP network cost Rusty Conover <rconover@infogears.com>
Re: TCP network cost david@lang.hm
Excellent. I'll take a look at this and report back here.

Ross


On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:17:00PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ross J. Reedstrom"  writes:
> > Summary: C client and large-object API python both send bits in
> > reasonable time, but I suspect there's still room for improvement in
> > libpq over TCP: I'm suspicious of the 6x difference. Detailed analysis
> > will probably find it's all down to memory allocation and extra copying
> > of bits around (client side)
> 
> I wonder if the backend isn't contributing to the problem too.  It chops
> its sends up into 8K units, which doesn't seem to create huge overhead
> in my environment but maybe it does in yours.  It'd be interesting to see
> what results you get from the attached quick-and-dirty patch (against
> HEAD, but it should apply back to at least 8.1).
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Дата:
От: Kouber Saparev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LIMIT confuses the planner
FAQ