Re: Question on Index usage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Monnerie
Тема Re: Question on Index usage
Дата
Msg-id 200901211558.58053@zmi.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question on Index usage  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
On Mittwoch 21 Januar 2009 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Seems like the problem is that it is not pushing the "status IN"
> condition as part of the index condition for some reason, and instead
> using it as a filter.  Maybe something to do with the selectivity of
> that clause?

I was reading your answer several times, and I think I understand now
what you mean. You mean "it doesn't use index _7 because the status IN
(0,1,2) isn't usable". I didn't think about that, but that's another
good point.

Instead, I meant: Why can't I just delete index _1, if anyway I have
index _7 with the same field, just plus additional fields. I thought
that would be redundant:

Index _1 = mailbox_idnr
Index _7 = mailbox_idnr,status,seen_flag

So I would guess that Index _1 is redundant, and I can delete it because
the planner will use _7 instead. After all, for searching any
mailbox_idnr in that table (~234k entries) it doesn't really matter if
you use index _1 or _7, the sort is the same (if you don't care about
the other fields).

mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Abdul Rahman
Дата:
Сообщение: autovacuum daemon
Следующее
От: paulo matadr
Дата:
Сообщение: Res: [GENERAL] bytea size limit?