Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
Дата
Msg-id 2008607.1594331766@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
... or on the other hand, maybe these animals are just showing more
sensitivity than others to an actual code bug.  skink is showing
valgrind failures in this very area, on both HEAD and v13:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skink&dt=2020-07-08%2021%3A13%3A02

==3166208== VALGRINDERROR-BEGIN
==3166208== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3166208==    at 0x28618D: KeepLogSeg (xlog.c:9627)
==3166208==    by 0x296AC5: GetWALAvailability (xlog.c:9533)
==3166208==    by 0x4FFECB: pg_get_replication_slots (slotfuncs.c:356)
==3166208==    by 0x3C762F: ExecMakeTableFunctionResult (execSRF.c:234)
==3166208==    by 0x3D9A9A: FunctionNext (nodeFunctionscan.c:95)
==3166208==    by 0x3C81D6: ExecScanFetch (execScan.c:133)
==3166208==    by 0x3C81D6: ExecScan (execScan.c:199)
==3166208==    by 0x3D99A9: ExecFunctionScan (nodeFunctionscan.c:270)
==3166208==    by 0x3C5072: ExecProcNodeFirst (execProcnode.c:450)
==3166208==    by 0x3BD35E: ExecProcNode (executor.h:245)
==3166208==    by 0x3BD35E: ExecutePlan (execMain.c:1646)
==3166208==    by 0x3BE039: standard_ExecutorRun (execMain.c:364)
==3166208==    by 0x3BE102: ExecutorRun (execMain.c:308)
==3166208==    by 0x559669: PortalRunSelect (pquery.c:912)
==3166208==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==3166208==    at 0x296A84: GetWALAvailability (xlog.c:9523)
==3166208==
==3166208== VALGRINDERROR-END

and even the most cursory look at the code confirms that there's a
real bug here.  KeepLogSeg expects *logSegNo to be defined on entry,
but GetWALAvailability hasn't bothered to initialize oldestSlotSeg.
It is not clear to me which one is in the wrong; the comment for
KeepLogSeg isn't particularly clear on this.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is this a bug in pg_current_logfile() on Windows?
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Stale external URL in doc?