On Freitag 19 Dezember 2008 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> You don't need to vacuum or reindex after a cluster; it removes all
> dead rows (except those that vacuum won't remove anyway)
OK, but I do not cluster all tables, as it only makes sense for tables
which get read in some sequential (based on that index) way. For
completely random accessed tables I skip cluster, and rely on
vacuum/reindex. Also, I think pg_toast tables cannot be clustered,
right?
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4