Re: Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql?

laser wrote:
> hi all,
> 
>  I read the code that it seems easy for the cursor in plpgsql to return 
> ROW_COUNT after
>  MOVE LAST etc. The SPI_processed variable already there, but didn't put 
> it into estate
>  structure, any reason for that?

[ Sorry for the delay.]

Would some tests how Oracle behaves in this case?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +