On Friday 21 November 2008 19:10:45 Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I think this is most probably explained by repeat postings
> of successive versions of large patches. Still, Ron might be on to
> something. I had not considered message lengths in my previous
> numbers ...
Also consider that since we started using the wiki for tracking patches, a lot
of trivial emails like "your patch has been added to the queue" and "where
are we on this" have disappeared.