On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:50:50PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Kenneth,
>
> > I just posted my timings for the parallel restore patch and
> > achieved a better than 2x improvement in restore times on a
> > 4-core system. Do you have a new candidate for me to check?
>
> Can you try out the SQL/MED WIP patch and report on how sane its
> fuctionality seems to you?
>
Okay, I will take a look.
> > Also, I do not know what the best way to request that we
> > include the small hash function patch that I submitted be
> > included in the final commitfest. It actually only adds back
> > the new/faster mixing functions that were stripped from the
> > original patch because there had been no tests of the new
> > functions. I submitted the test results with the final small
> > patch. Do you have any ideas?
>
> Re-submit it, with data, as a separate e-mail to hackers. Since it was
> part of a prior commitfest, it'll probably be accepted.
>
I already sent it in with the data. I just do not know what to
do to keep it in sight for the 8.4 release.
Thanks,
Ken
> --
> --Josh
>
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL
> San Francisco
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-rrreviewers mailing list (pgsql-rrreviewers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-rrreviewers
>