Kenneth,
> I just posted my timings for the parallel restore patch and
> achieved a better than 2x improvement in restore times on a
> 4-core system. Do you have a new candidate for me to check?
Can you try out the SQL/MED WIP patch and report on how sane its
fuctionality seems to you?
> Also, I do not know what the best way to request that we
> include the small hash function patch that I submitted be
> included in the final commitfest. It actually only adds back
> the new/faster mixing functions that were stripped from the
> original patch because there had been no tests of the new
> functions. I submitted the test results with the final small
> patch. Do you have any ideas?
Re-submit it, with data, as a separate e-mail to hackers. Since it was
part of a prior commitfest, it'll probably be accepted.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco