Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()?
| От | Sam Mason |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20081118160158.GO2459@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()?
Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:37:44AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:29:53AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Seems like you could just write SELECT ARRAY[col1, col2, col3]
> > instead of SELECT col1, col2, col3.
>
> If I understand this right, Pavel is thinking that
>
> ARRAY(SELECT col1, col2, col3...)
>
> should produce an array each element of which is the compound type
> consisting of (col1, col2, col3), and if it doesn't produce one, we're
> looking at a pretty large POLA violation.
I've used this syntax before and got a surprising message back. I'd
expect to be able to do the following:
ARRAY((SELECT col1, col2 FROM (VALUES ('a',1), ('b',2)) x(col1,col2)));
and get the following back {"(a,1)","(b,2)"}. So I think I'm with
David.
Sam
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: