Re: Choosing a filesystem
От
Kenneth Marshall
Тема
Re: Choosing a filesystem
Дата
Msg-id
20080911172332.GP6714@it.is.rice.edu
Ответ на
Re: Choosing a filesystem (Matthew Wakeling)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Choosing a filesystem Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
Re: Choosing a filesystem "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem david@lang.hm
Re: Choosing a filesystem "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Choosing a filesystem Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 06:18:37PM +0100, Matthew Wakeling wrote: > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Laszlo Nagy wrote: >> So the basic system will reside on a RAID 1 array, created from two SAS >> disks spinning at 15 000 rpm. I will buy 10 pieces of Seagate Barracuda >> 320GB SATA (ES 7200) disks for the rest. > > That sounds good. Put RAID 1 on the pair, and RAID 1+0 on the rest. It'll > be pretty good. Put the OS and the WAL on the pair, and the database on the > large array. > > However, one of the biggest things that will improve your performance > (especially in OLTP) is to use a proper RAID controller with a > battery-backed-up cache. > > Matthew > But remember that putting the WAL on a separate drive(set) will only help if you do not have competing I/O, such as system logging or paging, going to the same drives. This turns your fast sequential I/O into random I/O with the accompaning 10x or more performance decrease. Ken
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления