On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:30:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hm, I wonder if sloppiness of this sort accounts for the remarkable
> prevalence in my mail logs of spam-sign like this:
>
> Jun 9 00:44:06 sss2 sm-mta[4062]: m594i5Ns004062: <19570.1142971720@sss.pgh.pa.us>... User unknown
Good bet.
> I don't pretend to know what is the approved way to deal with these
> issues, but *this* can't be best practice.
Obviously, someone is looking for something that _looks_ like a mail
address, attempting to munge it, and on the way through, changing it
to a mailto: link. I think some parsing of the RFC2821/2822 headers
is needed first, so that one doesn't do this for things like the
message id.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/