Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
> >> not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
> >> announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the first
> >> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
> >> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, we expected to have glitches. I think we now have a much better
> > idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Yes. I'm not meaning to whine, sorry if it comes over like that. It
> looks to me like we need a sort of prep phase for a commit-fest, so the
> people switching into commit-fest mode when it starts can do so with
> little friction.
Yea, I think we are still learning, and polishing our tools.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +