-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:43:45 +0100
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> we develop PostgreSQL, but why create own syntax for all? Why? Only so
> we develop PostgreSQL? We have different implementation and different
> limit, but why create different syntax, I don't understand. It's like
> Microsoft. Lot of things are little bit incompatible.
O.k. hold on guys. I really don't care what you do with plpgsql. I
don't use it unless I absolutely have to anyway. All I was doing was
saying that:
A. I could give flying donkey butt about being the Oracle-Compatible
community.
B. That "SWITCH" may be an alternate syntax because 15 years ago when I
took a CS class and I did one chapter of C they had a SWITCH statement
that resembles CASE.
Please continue on.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHj4hVATb/zqfZUUQRAhbpAJ9+qwBAHqxwSCCeVzbRjKBiFTpVhQCdEX+j
vrXiUgBeLQoBKx3s68214qw=
=kc7c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----