-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:15:52 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Committers <-- this is obvious the only question is it only
> > committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing to
> > the -www guys (I think yes to equal billing)
> >
> >
>
> I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers
> and www maintainers should be indentified separately.
Why? Then we have to also separate advocacy which is just as important
and pgfoundry... as well as possibly a host of others. We all have our
job in the community :).
> On a closely
> related note: last time I looked there was no way for anyone to
> discover on the web site who the committers actually are. That would
> also probably be useful.
See Dave's response about core not wanting committers that easily
identified. I actually recall this argument, basically there are times
when commit access might be revoked temporarily etc... IIRC..
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTbGmATb/zqfZUUQRAucRAJ9Xc3Rg7/rbyKD2BjuKJDOeIQaYBwCfbH31
xuLvWYGSfuM7O1DnI8HHK4k=
=SrRN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----