-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:37:21 -0400
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
> > Just because a company does the primary development that does not
> > mean it is not community code. Command Prompt is "core" on the
> > ODBCng project. Nothing more.
>
> These arguments I do agree with ... maybe some sort of 'feature
> matrix' is needed where we're dealing with multiple versions ... have
> an ODBC.html page and allow other 'versions' of ODBC include their
> products, commercial and open source ...
To be clear (again).
I do not care that ODBCng is placed under psqlODBC. I do agree with
Marc's argument that Alphabetical would be better, but I really don't
care other than that.
What I do care about is the argument above. ODBCng "is" a community
project. What set me off, and what continues to raise my ire is the
obvious bias, ignorance and bigotry against an Open Source project that
is a community project, just because a company, which happens to be one
of the most prevalent supporters of the PostgreSQL community is the
primary developer.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPdlPATb/zqfZUUQRAlvxAJ9vKGy9gNFjBLB+xnLE2b19iXCrlQCeNwg+
pMemuAEJ2oSLyvIAOXeKt1g=
=snm4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----