Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sam Mason
Тема Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Дата
Msg-id 20071112173720.GS1955@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:31:59AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:29 AM, Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> wrote:
> > You don't need a 32bit kernel to support 8GB of memory should you? As
> > long as the kernel supports PAE that should be enough to make use of it.
> > You only need a 64bit address space when each process wants to see more
> > than ~3GB of RAM.
>
> There's a performance hit for using PAE.  Not sure what it is, but I
> recall it being the in the 5 to 10% range.

And what's the performance hit of using native 64bit code?  I'd guess
similar, moving twice as much data around with each pointer has got to
affect things.


  Sam

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Scott Marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Следующее
От: Steve Wampler
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance