OK, moved to patches list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > Do we have anyone actively maintaining pltcl these days? I'm intentionally
> > quite unfamiliar with Tcl or I would be happy to verify it's reasonable. But
> > the explanation seems pretty convincing. If we don't have anyone maintaining
> > it then we're pretty much at the mercy of applying whatever patches come in
> > from people who are more familiar with it than us. In my experience that's how
> > new maintainers for modules of free software are often found anyways.
> >
> >
>
> I was hoping that Jan or somebody else with some Tcl-fu would comment. I
> agree it probably shouldn't be deferred.
>
> It does bother me a bit that the Tcl engine startup just starts firing
> up threads without advertisement - I wondered if we shouldn't kick back
> and say it's their problem to fix.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +