Re: cache problem (v2)
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: cache problem (v2) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20070717152848.GD21688@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: cache problem (v2) (De Leeuw Guy <G.De_Leeuw@eurofer.be>) |
| Ответы |
Re: cache problem (v2)
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 07:59:32AM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote: > the COPY start a transaction Yes. _Everything_ is in a transaction in PostgreSQL. If you don't explicitly do BEGIN. . .COMMIT, then the system does it implicitly for each statement. > if yes each time my trigger select a data > and update then the value returned by the read are the value before the > transaction. It's true ? if yes my question are : also in the same > transaction (like my trigger) ? Your trigger function runs inside the transaction of the calling statement, unless you have explicitly started a transaction. I'm starting to get the impression you have a misunderstanding of how PostgreSQL works. I think you maybe need to spend some more time with the manual. If you find the English version puzzling, you can also work in French (at http://docs.postgresqlfr.org/) or German (I see a translation at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/books/pghandbuch.html.de; I dunno if there's a more recent one). Sorry, AFAIK there isn't one in Dutch. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness. --George Orwell
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: