write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char
От
Patrick Welche
Тема
write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char
Дата
Msg-id
20070628181651.GR19698@quartz.itdept.newn.cam.ac.uk
Список
Дерево обсуждения
write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
Re: write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char imad <immaad@gmail.com>
Re: write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: write past chunk end in ExprContext / to_char Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
With today's CVS code (originally noticed with 8.2beta3), on a PC where INT_MAX=0x7FFFFFFF=2147483647 postgres=# select version(); version ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PostgreSQL 8.3devel on i386-unknown-netbsdelf4.99.20, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070110 prerelease (NetBSD nb1 20070603) (1 row) postgres=# select to_char(2147483647,'999,999,999'); to_char -------------- ###,###,### (1 row) postgres=# select to_char(2147483648,'999,999,999'); WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 0x845509c WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 0x845509c to_char -------------- ###,###,### (1 row) postgres=# select to_char(2147483648,'99,999,999'); to_char ------------- ##,###,### (1 row) postgres=# select to_char(2147483648,'9,999,999,999'); to_char ---------------- 2,147,483,648 (1 row) postgres=# select to_char(1234567890123,'999,999,999,999'); WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 0x845509c WARNING: detected write past chunk end in ExprContext 0x845509c to_char ------------------ ###,###,###,### (1 row) postgres=# select to_char(1234567890123,'99,999,999,999'); to_char ----------------- ##,###,###,### (1 row) So strangely, to get the worrying WARNING, I seem to need >INT_MAX with a format string with 1 less positions than necessary - no wonder I seemed to only see it randomly... Thoughts? Cheers, Patrick
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата: