Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Дата
Msg-id 20070417192616.GB72669@nasby.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:36:01AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I seem to remember that we'd agreed that autovacuum should ignore any
> > globally set statement_timeout, on the grounds that a poorly chosen
> > setting could indefinitely prevent large tables from being vacuumed.
> 
> On a vaguely related matter, should programs such as pg_dump, vacuumdb, 
> and reindexdb disable statement_timeout?

Youch... yes, they should IMO. Add clusterdb, pg_dumpall and pg_restore
to that list as well (really, pg_dump(all) should output a command to
disable statement_timeout).
-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: utf8 COPY DELIMITER?
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout