Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Дата
Msg-id 200704071129.38320.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Folks,

> > I'll see what I can do on the NetBSD and Solaris fronts.
>
> IMO, the Solaris one is probably more important than NetBSD.

Solaris is taken care of ... should be online in a week or two.  Sun DBTG Q.A. 
set up in the Sun labs:

Solaris 9 + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris 8 + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris 10 + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris 10 + x86 + SunCC
Solaris 10 + x86 + gcc
Solaris Nevada + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris Nevada + x86 + SunCC
Solaris Nevada + x86 + gcc

... which ought to cover most of the platforms we're interested in from 
Solaris.  The 8 and 9 machines will just build current, but the 10 and Nevada 
machines will build CVS, 8.1, 8.2 and rotationally older versions (once each 
week).  We're building in as many options as we have support for, including 
perl, kerberos (on Nevada), Dtrace (on 8.2) and integer-datetimes.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Pavan Deolasee"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Optimized pgbench for 8.3
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fate of pgsnmpd