Re: Wrong record type - caused by SELECT order ???

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: Wrong record type - caused by SELECT order ???
Дата
Msg-id 20061027152556.C86806@megazone.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Wrong record type - caused by SELECT order ???  (John Cobo <johnecobo@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, John Cobo wrote:

> I am trying to create some functions which return many rows using
> plpgsql.  This example could be done with SQL, but later I will need
> plpglsql.  I was constantly getting the wrong record type error with a
> couple different functions.  Finally I found that if I changed the order
> of columns in the SELECT statement then this simple example would work.
>
> Any suggestions as to why this is happening or what I can do to
> consistently get such functions to work ?  Is there an easier way to do
> all this ?  (

Well, I think the simple answer is to return next foo rather than rec in
the function.

The longer answer is that in the first case you're returning a record with
an int first and a varchar second and in the second you're return a record
with a varchar first and an int second and category_list is compatible
with the latter and not the former.

> select * from list_categories(1,200608);
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ERROR:  wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT
> CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function "list_categories" line 11 at return next
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION list_categories(int4, int4)
>   RETURNS SETOF category_list AS
> $BODY$
> DECLARE
>   foo category_list;
>   rec RECORD;
> BEGIN
> FOR rec IN
>    SELECT  c.id, c.category_name  FROM categories c WHERE user_id = pUser_id
>    LOOP
>      foo.Oid := rec.id;
>      foo.Ocategory_name := rec.category_name;
>      RETURN NEXT rec;
>    END LOOP;
> RETURN;
> END;
> $BODY$
>   LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> However, if I change the order of columns in the SELECT and run the same:
> select * from list_categories(1,200608);
>
> Then the function works fine
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION list_categories(int4, int4)
>   RETURNS SETOF category_list AS
> $BODY$
> DECLARE
>   foo category_list;
>   rec RECORD;
> BEGIN
> FOR rec IN
>    SELECT  c.category_name, c.id FROM categories c WHERE user_id = pUser_id
>    LOOP
>      foo.Oid := rec.id;
>      foo.Ocategory_name := rec.category_name;
>      RETURN NEXT rec;
>    END LOOP;
> RETURN;
> END;
> $BODY$
>   LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
> ----------------------------------------------
> The table:
> CREATE TABLE categories
> (
>   id int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('categories_id_seq'::regclass),
>   user_id int4 NOT NULL,
>   category_name varchar(45) NOT NULL,
>   CONSTRAINT "categoriesPK" PRIMARY KEY (id),
>   CONSTRAINT "categories_userFK" FOREIGN KEY (user_id) REFERENCES users (id) ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION
> )
> WITHOUT OIDS;
>
> and TYPE
> CREATE TYPE category_list AS
>    (ocategory_name varchar(60),
>     oid int4);

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Mailing list problem?
Следующее
От: Maurice Yarrow
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CREATE TABLE initial value for PRIMARY KEY