Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: why not kill -9 postmaster |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20061020132954.GD27869@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: why not kill -9 postmaster (Shane Ambler <pgsql@007Marketing.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
Re: why not kill -9 postmaster |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Shane Ambler wrote: > The one thing worse than kill -9 the postmaster is pulling the power > cord out of the server. Which is what makes UPS's so good. > > If your server is changing the data file on disk and you pull the power > cord, what chance do you expect of reading that data file again? 1. That's what we have WAL for. The only thing that can really kill you is the use of non-battery-backed write cache. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: