Re: why not kill -9 postmaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
Дата
Msg-id 20061020132954.GD27869@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: why not kill -9 postmaster  (Shane Ambler <pgsql@007Marketing.com>)
Ответы Re: why not kill -9 postmaster  ("Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa@gmail.com>)
Re: why not kill -9 postmaster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Shane Ambler wrote:

> The one thing worse than kill -9 the postmaster is pulling the power
> cord out of the server. Which is what makes UPS's so good.
>
> If your server is changing the data file on disk and you pull the power
> cord, what chance do you expect of reading that data file again?

1.  That's what we have WAL for.  The only thing that can really kill
you is the use of non-battery-backed write cache.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shane Ambler
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
Следующее
От: Andreas Seltenreich
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: c function returning high resolution timestamp