[Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Дата
Msg-id 20060825161633.GJ14622@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Autovacuum on by default?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> - Leave base thresholds alone (pending further analysis that might remove them 
> >> altogether?)
> 
> > While there is talk of removing this all together, I think it was also 
> > agreed that as long as these values are there, they should be reduced. 
> > I think the defaults in 8.1 are 1000/500, I think 200/100 was suggested.
> 
> ISTM that if we don't want to remove the thresholds immediately,
> we should make them default to zero for a release or two and see how
> well it works.
> 
> At the moment I can't find the thread that discussed removing them,
> but IIRC there were some good arguments why the thresholds should always
> be zero.

I can't find it either, but I think the bug reported here is related:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-06/thrd2.php#00951

On the other hand, I don't think we completely resolved this, so I
proposed this be added to the "Open Items" list.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case