> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Mario Weilguni wrote:
> > > > Will this patch make it into 8.2?
> > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php
> > > >
> > > > It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool.
> > >
> > > No, it will not because RESET CONNECTION can mess up interface code that
> > > doesn't want the connection reset. We are not sure how to handle that.
> >
> > Hmm, what interface code are you talking about?
>
> I believe JDBC, for example, sets things inside the interface that would
> be broken by RESET CONNECTION. Here is a thread about it:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-01/msg00029.php
I think we had similar problem with client encoding and solved it by
using parameter status. Why don't we solve the JDBC problem in the
same way?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan