Re: plpgsql by default

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> No, but does that mean we should increase the potential by adding in
>> something that not everyone that runs PostgreSQL actually uses?
>
> Using this argument I could say that we don't need primary keys, foreign
> keys, views or rules. Especially the latter 3 ;).

*slap forehead* *groan*

then again, if we could pull it out and move it into loadable modules ... 
hmmmm ... >:)


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664