Re: plpgsql by default

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 19:35 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> >
> >> No, but does that mean we should increase the potential by adding in
> >> something that not everyone that runs PostgreSQL actually uses?
> >
> > Using this argument I could say that we don't need primary keys, foreign
> > keys, views or rules. Especially the latter 3 ;).
> 
> *slap forehead* *groan*
> 
> then again, if we could pull it out and move it into loadable modules ... 
> hmmmm ... >:)

Oh goodness. We could declare that we are better then MySQL because our
referential integrity is optional... oh wait...

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> 
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
> 
-- 
           === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===     Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency:
+1.800.492.2240    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/