--- "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:16:29PM +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 06:03 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > I'd hope that RH would support at least the
> > > most recent version of 7.4, since presumably that's part of what
> they
> > > pay Tom for... Just understand that 7.4 is approaching
> end-of-life.
> > > (Presumably so is RHEL2...)
> >
> > RH won't support a newer (or older) major version of PostgreSQL
> which is
> > not included in RHEL 2.1. This is Red Hat's policy -- they do not
> update
> > to new major release in a distribution. I mean, (AFAIR) RHEL 2.1
> ships
> > with PostgreSQL 7.3 and they won't support a newer major version.
> >
> > However, I agree with you, if the support is the primary concern,
> there
> > are some support options around.
>
> Oh, I missed that this was actually a 7.3 database. That seriously
> limits your options, though at least 7.3 is still supported via
> Tom/Red
> Hat.
Hi Jim,
do you mean PostgreSQL 7.3 is supported by RedHat on Advanced Server
2.1?
I only found PostgreSQL 7.1.3's rpms for RedHat Advanced Server 2.1, no
newer version anymore.
Anyway, since I cannot upgrade the operating system, could anybody give
me recommendation for which PostgreSQL version is more stable on 2.1?
Best regards,
Leon
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com