On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:54:37PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >
> > >This archive:
> > >
> > >http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php
> >
> > http://svr5.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php is the build
> > server for the archives, and is up to date ... so I'm going to guess that
> > the front-end server hasn't had a chance to sync up yet ...
>
> Sorry for the noise. Looks like the pages don't get updated if there
> was no traffic which means that as long as no emails cross the list,
> the page will keep displaying the old date. It seems logical and will
> teach me for jumping to conclusions...
Actually, it would be much better IMHO if the last updated date was
changed even if there was no traffic. Otherwise there's no way to know
if the updates are actually working.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461