Обсуждение: Web archive issue?
This archive: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php was last updated on wednesday, whereas the others: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-12/index.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2005-12/index.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-12/index.php have all been updated today. Does it need some magic pixie dust to start working again? :) BTW, the mailing lists seem to be blazingly fast recently, very nice. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > This archive: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php http://svr5.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php is the build server for the archives, and is up to date ... so I'm going to guess that the front-end server hasn't had a chance to sync up yet ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > >This archive: > > > >http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php > > http://svr5.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php is the build > server for the archives, and is up to date ... so I'm going to guess that > the front-end server hasn't had a chance to sync up yet ... Sorry for the noise. Looks like the pages don't get updated if there was no traffic which means that as long as no emails cross the list, the page will keep displaying the old date. It seems logical and will teach me for jumping to conclusions... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:54:37PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > > > >This archive: > > > > > >http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php > > > > http://svr5.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/index.php is the build > > server for the archives, and is up to date ... so I'm going to guess that > > the front-end server hasn't had a chance to sync up yet ... > > Sorry for the noise. Looks like the pages don't get updated if there > was no traffic which means that as long as no emails cross the list, > the page will keep displaying the old date. It seems logical and will > teach me for jumping to conclusions... Actually, it would be much better IMHO if the last updated date was changed even if there was no traffic. Otherwise there's no way to know if the updates are actually working. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461