On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:20:46AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >Neil Conway suggested something like a get_function_list(), which I
> >presume would be called on connect, and would be version-aware.
> >Does this seem like a good idea? If so, what might an
> >implementation look like? I know C isn't all that great for
> >function overloading, so do we want to keep all the SQL for all
> >previous versions in memory, or...?
>
> If it was me I'd just copy the pg_dump way of doing things...
To the extent possible, I'd like to preserve the exact functionality
(or lack thereof) of previous versions. Would this be possible that
way?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!