Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051130143814.R1077@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
'k, moved it all into OLD as well ... haven't removed anything until more opt in on this ... I do agree that if you really want that old, you can build from scratch, but I'm also not the one that went to the trouble of building the binaries :) On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Someone suggested earlier that we should drop the binaries for > nonsupported versions completely from the ftp site. Thoughts on this? > > If not, they should at least go into OLD as well. But personally, I'm > for dropping them completely. If you're on something that old (heck, we > have 7.0 binaries..), you can still build from source. > > Speaking of which, any reason not to drop the 8.1 beta win32 binaries? > > //Magnus > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier >> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:31 PM >> To: Robert Treat >> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; pgsql-www@postgresql.org; >> Tom Lane; Andrew Dunstan >> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases >> >> >> Done, as well as moved all but the last two of each version after ... >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Robert Treat wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:40, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Personally I expect to keep supporting 7.3 for a long >> while, because >>>> Red Hat pays me to ;-) ... and the EOL date for RHEL3 is a >> long way away yet. >>>> The PG community may stop bothering with 7.3 releases >> before that. >>>> But I think Marc and Bruce figure "as long as the patches >> are in our >>>> CVS we may as well put out a release". >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, thats one of the reasons I am skeptical about having official >>> policies on this type of thing. If Sun decided they wanted to >>> maintain 7.2 and were going to dedicate developers and >> testing for it, >>> would we really turn that away? OK, I don't really want to >> have this >>> discussion again, but as of now I think we are all agreed >> that 7.2 is unsupported. >>> >>>> We hashed all this out in the pghackers list back in August, but I >>>> agree there ought to be something about it on the website. >>>> >>> >>> We've been kicking it around but haven't moved much on this... >>> >>> Marc, can you move the 7.2 branches in the FTP under the >> OLD directory? >>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/ >>> >>> We need to do the same with 7.2 documentation, moving them into the >>> Manual Archive >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/archive.html. >>> We can also change the caption on the main documentation >> page to note >>> these are manuals for the current supported versions. >>> >>> -- >>> Robert Treat >>> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL >>> >>> ---------------------------(end of >>> broadcast)--------------------------- >>> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >>> >> >> ---- >> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services >> (http://www.hub.org) >> Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy >> ICQ: 7615664 >> >> ---------------------------(end of >> broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to >> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not >> match >> > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: