Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags
Дата
Msg-id 200510311801.j9VI1wP10746@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",)
Список pgsql-patches
Дерево обсуждения 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > If you go for a new state code, rather than a separate
> > boolean, does it reduce the size of the patch?
>
> No, and it certainly wouldn't improve my level of confidence in it ...

Well, then what real options do we have?  It seems the patch is just
required for all branches.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",)