Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Keep in mind that the addition of the interval_justify_hours() did
> > generate some regression test changes, so removing
> > interval_justify_hours() might just take the results back to what we had
> > in 8.0.
>
> Not hardly. I tried already. The existing timestamp_mi behavior is
> probably as close to 8.0 as we can get given the change in underlying
> representation.
You mean the '6432 hours' is a worse change, OK.
> > I guess my point is that we are changing 8.0.X behavior so we better be
> > sure it is now the way we want it to remain.
>
> [ shrug... ] We've changed datetime behavior in every past release,
> we're changing it for 8.1, we'll probably change it some more for 8.2,
> and again after that. All the datetime code is a work in progress.
> Get used to it.
OK, as long as we are sure we are not going to change it back to 8.0
behavior.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073