Michael Adler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:13:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> > > What do people think of exposing pg_usleep() to the user?
> >
> > I'm not real enthused about it. Generally speaking, a sleep() on the
> > database side means you are idling while holding locks, and that does
> > not seem like something we want to encourage people to do.
> >
> > As other responders noted, it's trivial to program this in any of the
> > untrusted PL languages, So what you're really proposing is that we give
> > sleep() to non-superusers, and that seems like a bit of a hard sell.
> > Let's see a use-case or three.
>
> There may be a better alternative, but wouldn't this let application
> writers easily test the effects of a long running transaction?
What is wrong with giving non-super-users sleep() access? It is a
natural part of almost every programming language.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073