On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:44:08PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> I wonder if the sqlcode value of 0 on which you're relying is
> correct, since SQL-92 mentions a value of 100 as meaning "no data."
> (BTW, SQL-92 deprecates SQLCODE, and SQL:1999 appears to have removed
> it altogether.)
...none of which might be relevant if ODBC defines things differently.
--
Michael Fuhr