Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't have a problem with removing it as a writable option ... but
> >> I'm thinking we should leave it as a read-only GUC parameter (like
> >> the several others we have already). Otherwise we'll need to add some
> >> other method of finding out whether the collector is running.
>
> > Why would a user care?
>
> luser> It's not collecting statistics!
>
> us> Is the collector running?
>
> luser> How should I know?
>
> us> er ...
>
> If we don't have a way to check this, we'll regret it soon enough...
> now maybe a GUC setting isn't the optimal way, but I think we need
> *some* way besides ps. ps doesn't work remotely and I think there's
> no simple equivalent under Windows either.
Sure, but the GUC only reports that it thinks the stats collector
started, not whether it is running or not. I think 'ps' is a fine way
to tell.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073