Re: User Quota Implementation
От | Yann Michel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: User Quota Implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050610191615.GA26490@zoom.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: User Quota Implementation (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: User Quota Implementation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Josh! On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:13:52AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Yeah. I'd prefer per-database quotas, rather than per-user quotas, which > seem kind of useless. The hard part is making any transaction which > would exceed the per-database quota roll back cleanly with a > comprehensible error message rather than just having the database shut > down. > > If we had per-database user quotas, and per-database users, it would pretty > much wind up all of the issues which ISPs have with Postgres. O.K. This makes sens to me. Otherwise I'd like to see quotas per tablespace. As far as I got it, a tablespace may grow in size untile the volume is full. Here a grace quota might be usefull as well. Let's say a 5% threshold like the ext filesystem as an default for generating a warning to th elogs files letting the admin extend the volum(s) by time. Regards, Yann
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: