Re: User Quota Implementation
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User Quota Implementation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200506101013.52759.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: User Quota Implementation (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: User Quota Implementation
Re: User Quota Implementation |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce, Yann, > Sure. Basically there has not been a lot of interest in this, and we > are not sure how to implement it without a huge amount of work. > Considering the other things we are working on, it hasn't been a > priority, and lots of folks don't like the Oracle approach either. Yeah. I'd prefer per-database quotas, rather than per-user quotas, which seem kind of useless. The hard part is making any transaction which would exceed the per-database quota roll back cleanly with a comprehensible error message rather than just having the database shut down. If we had per-database user quotas, and per-database users, it would pretty much wind up all of the issues which ISPs have with Postgres. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: