On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:43:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl> writes:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:03:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So the initial evidence is that this was not an intentional change.
> >> Do we want to revert it? The behavior has been in the field now for
> >> more than a full release cycle --- all 7.4.* releases behave this way
> >> --- so one could argue that we should leave it be.
>
> > ... Personally I think it should be reverted.
>
> OK, next question: is this a bug fix we should back-patch into 7.4,
> or just change it in HEAD?
I guess apply only in HEAD, and provide the patch for MLikharev so he
can solve his immediate problem.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
Thou shalt study thy libraries and strive not to reinvent them without
cause, that thy code may be short and readable and thy days pleasant
and productive. (7th Commandment for C Programmers)