Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Дата
Msg-id 20050502210556.GZ47820@decibel.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1  (<adnandursun@asrinbilisim.com.tr>)
Ответы Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Список pgsql-hackers
FWIW, I've found myself wishing I could set statement_timeout on a per user
or per group basis. Likewise for log_min_duration_statement.

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:38:12PM +0300, adnandursun@asrinbilisim.com.tr wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2005 19:53:56 -0000
>  Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> wrote:
> 
> >The server-based method is actually no more complex to
> >implement on the server end and does not impose any such
> restrictions on
> >the client (even if the client sets the option and then
> ignores the database connection
> >for a long time, all that happens is that the TCP window
> fills up).
> 
> Yes, any solution on the client side also requires all
> client connection interface to be changed..But, at server
> side solution only server side would be changed :-) I dont
> know it is complex or not. as you know Oracle has a
> parameter to implement that solution on the server side. 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Adnan DURSUN
> ASRIN Bili?im Hiz.Ltd.
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match
> 

-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement