On Thursday 14 April 2005 21:08, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > It is a Postgres limitation as well. We _could_ make the server "really
> > start the transaction" at the point the first query is issued instead of
> > when the BEGIN is issued. In fact this problem would go away if we did
> > that.
>
> Yeah; I seem to remember Tom Lane suggesting such an approach at one
> point. I had the vague idea it might happen in 8.0, but for some
> reason I think it didn't. (Anyway, that's probably off topic for
> this list.)
I don't see this behaviour under 8.0.0, and it's presumably fixed:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2004-06/msg00018.php
Is it safe to issue a "kill -2 <pid-of-idle-process>", will the
connection-pool reconnect?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Senior Software Developer / Manager
gpg public_key: http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
OfficeNet AS | The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Hoffsveien 17 | know how to do a thing and to watch |
PO. Box 425 Skøyen | somebody else doing it wrong, without |
0213 Oslo | comment. |
NORWAY | |
Phone : +47 22 13 01 00 | |
Direct: +47 22 13 10 03 | |
Mobile: +47 909 56 963 | |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------+