On Thursday 10 February 2005 08:26, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]
> > Sent: 10 February 2005 13:17
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Svr2 move to borg
> >
> > On Thursday 10 February 2005 05:55, Dave Page wrote:
> > > In related news, can advocacy.postgresql.org be laid to rest now?
> >
> > I was going to write up that same email this morning. I was
> > thinking that
> > maybe we ought to preserve it someplace for historical
> > reasons, but otherwise
> > I think it is sufficiently crufty that we need to shut it
> > down. IIRC the
> > idea was to point advocacy.postgresql.org to
> > www.postgresql.org/about/,
> > though I wonder if we should have any requests to advocacy
> > actualy bring up a
> > static page explaining that the site has been laid to rest
> > and with a pointer
> > to the main website. This would allow us to have the static
> > page translated
> > into all the languages that were on advocacy, and provide pointers to
> > whenever it might be best for those languages users to go.
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Sounds good to me. I assume it's all in CVS, so we will still have
> everything?
>
Well, we have two options I guess... either make sure everyhting on the site
is synched up with cvs, or create a tarball of whats live and save that
someplace and remove it from cvs. In either case we'll need to keep a copy
of the db around, since a lot of the content(like the translated pages) was
kept in the db.
> On a similar note, what about the developer site? I know there is some
> stuff deep-linked form the main site, but the actual formatted pages
> have all been replaced now haven't they?
>
Yeah... I had hoped to get some redirects/links going from the developer site
into the main www site, but have become backlogged on actual work so it isn't
getting done very quickly.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL