Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 23:42 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I don't remember this patch.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00331.php
>
> > How is it related to the other pg_dump
> > patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?
>
> I missed the July '04 discussion about the other patches for improving
> -t behavior. AFAIK the patches are unrelated.
>
> Something like the design elaborated here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00374.php
>
> looks good to me, and would be preferrable to Andreas' patch IMHO.
> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see a patch from David Skoll in
> that thread that actually implements the above behavior. I'd be happy to
> implement Tom's suggested design for 8.1 unless someone has already
> beaten me to it.
There were actually competing pg_dump -n patches in July. I think I
just kept the last one posted.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073