Re: pgdump
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgdump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1105937990.22946.17.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgdump (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgdump
Re: pgdump |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 23:42 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I don't remember this patch. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00331.php > How is it related to the other pg_dump > patches in the 8.1 pathces queue? I missed the July '04 discussion about the other patches for improving -t behavior. AFAIK the patches are unrelated. Something like the design elaborated here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00374.php looks good to me, and would be preferrable to Andreas' patch IMHO. Unless I'm missing something, I don't see a patch from David Skoll in that thread that actually implements the above behavior. I'd be happy to implement Tom's suggested design for 8.1 unless someone has already beaten me to it. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: