Re: pgdump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Neil Conway
Тема Re: pgdump
Дата
Msg-id 1105937990.22946.17.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgdump  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pgdump  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: pgdump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 23:42 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I don't remember this patch.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00331.php

> How is it related to the other pg_dump
> patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?

I missed the July '04 discussion about the other patches for improving
-t behavior. AFAIK the patches are unrelated.

Something like the design elaborated here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00374.php

looks good to me, and would be preferrable to Andreas' patch IMHO.
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see a patch from David Skoll in
that thread that actually implements the above behavior. I'd be happy to
implement Tom's suggested design for 8.1 unless someone has already
beaten me to it.

-Neil




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgdump
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgdump