Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Buttafuoco
Тема Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
Дата
Msg-id 20040830171130.M90360@contactbda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom,

I have confirmed that 7.4.3 works on the cobalt raq mipsel system.  I have not looked at the s_lock.[ch] code as I 
have not coded in C for years and don't know the backend code very well.  Do you have any ideas?

Jim

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: jim@contactbda.com
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:57 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel 

> "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com> writes:
> > Shouldn't this also work on mipsel CPU's?
> 
> It should work on a real MIPS CPU.  The PlayStation 2 has a dumbed-down
> MIPS chip without the TAS instruction :-(, but now that we've eliminated
> that point I think you've found a problem.  We made several
> reorganizations in the spinlock code between 7.4 and 8.0 that could
> possibly have broken the platforms we were not testing on --- can you
> take a look at the changes in s_lock.h and s_lock.c and see where we
> went wrong?
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match
------- End of Original Message -------



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Treat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel