Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Oliver Jowett wrote:
> >
> >>Merlin Moncure wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Another way to deal with the problem is to defer plan generation until
> >>>the first plan execution and use the parameters from that execution.
> >>
> >>When talking the V3 protocol, 7.5 defers plan generation for the unnamed
> >>statement until parameters are received in the Bind message (which is
> >>essentially the same as what you describe). There was some discussion at
> >>the time about making it more flexible so you could apply it to arbitary
> >>statements, but that needed a protocol change so it didn't happen.
> >
> >
> > What do you mean about arbitrary statements? Non-prepared ones, or
> > non-unnamed ones?
>
> Non-unnamed ones. Adding flag on the Parse message that says when to
> plan the statement (or maybe on each Bind message even).
OK, what are unnamed prepared statements? When are they used currently?
Only via the wire protocol? Who uses them now?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073