Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200407211324.58538.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Simon, > The Aberdeen report is very poorly written. ISTM that they are confused > as to which database is which and have done very little research beyond > they "spoke to some MySQL users". The report seems to have been > re-published recently, with no updated facts. If your listening boys, > sue me - I could do with a new car. Apparently the author no longer works for Aberdeen. So maybe they weren't happy with the report either. I took up the inaccuracies with SleepyCat, who commissioned the report, and they took it up with Aberdeen ... but I don't know what happened after that. Certainly they haven't corrected the report. I don't think there's anything we *can* do at the moment other than take it up with an attorney, which really hasn't been our project's style. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: