When grilled further on (Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:19:05 -0700),
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> confessed:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Huh? I just use Spamassassin myself, with Razor/Pyzor/DCC and Bayes all
> > enabled ...
>
> I use exactly the same setup. But recently I've noticed that the
> spammers are getting smarter -- I think 20% of it is slipping by the
> filters. I'm going to need something better.
>
Have you played with the "spamassassin --report" feature? Works fairly well if
you can integrate it into your e-mail client and report a bunch of
messages as spam. It trains the Bayes filter and reports to Razor (at
the least).
Sylpheed Claws has actions (you use "spamassassin--report %F" as the action),
and it'll batch the report on all selected messages.
I find that after a 10-20 messages, it starts finding the ones that were
slipping through. Since February, I have 200 missed out of 4200.
Cheers,
Rob
--
22:28:27 up 3 days, 2:06, 3 users, load average: 3.24, 3.08, 3.45
Linux 2.6.5-01 #5 SMP Tue Apr 6 21:32:39 MDT 2004